Protocol Comparison

EtherCAT vs CANopen: Choosing the Right Industrial Protocol

Both EtherCAT and CANopen are widely used in industrial automation, but they serve different use cases. This article helps OEM engineers make the right protocol choice for their equipment design.

Protocol Overview

EtherCAT (Ethernet for Control Automation Technology) is a high-performance, real-time Ethernet protocol developed by Beckhoff. It processes data on-the-fly as Ethernet frames pass through each slave node, achieving sub-microsecond synchronization across hundreds of devices.

CANopen is a higher-layer protocol built on the CAN (Controller Area Network) bus. It provides standardized device profiles, emergency handling, and object dictionary-based configuration. CANopen is popular in mobile machinery, medical devices, and compact industrial systems.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Dimension EtherCAT CANopen
Bandwidth 100 Mbps (Ethernet) 1 Mbps max (CAN 2.0B)
Cycle Time Down to 100 µs Typically 1–10 ms
Node Count Up to 65,535 per segment Up to 127 per bus
Topology Line, tree, star (any Ethernet topology) Bus (line only)
Cable Type Standard Ethernet Cat5e/Cat6 Shielded twisted pair (CAN bus)
Max Cable Length 100m per segment Up to 1000m at 50 kbps
Slave Hardware Cost Medium (dedicated ESC chip required) Low (simple CAN transceiver)
Synchronization Distributed clocks (DC) — sub-µs jitter SYNC object — ms-level
Best For Motion control, servo drives, robotics, large I/O systems Sensor networks, small distributed systems, mobile machinery

When to Choose EtherCAT

EtherCAT is the optimal choice when your application demands:

  • High-speed motion control: Multi-axis servo systems, CNC machines, and robotics requiring sub-ms cycle times
  • Large node count: Systems with 20+ distributed I/O nodes or slave devices
  • Deterministic synchronization: Applications needing µs-level synchronization between multiple axes (e.g., gantry systems, electronic gearing)
  • High data throughput: Vision data, high-resolution encoder feedback, or complex process data

Our EtherCAT STM32F429BIT6 board provides a complete EtherCAT slave implementation with integrated CAN for mixed-protocol architectures.

When to Choose CANopen

CANopen remains the better choice for:

  • Cost-sensitive small systems: Applications with fewer than 10 nodes where CAN hardware cost advantage matters
  • Long cable runs: Installations needing 200m+ cable distances (CAN supports up to 1000m at lower baud rates)
  • Existing CAN infrastructure: Systems already using CAN-based sensors or actuators
  • Mobile machinery: Vehicles and outdoor equipment where CAN J1939/CANopen is the industry standard

Our STM32F407 and STM32F103ZE boards both support CAN/CANopen for these applications.

Hybrid Architectures

In many real-world installations, you don't have to choose just one. A common architecture uses EtherCAT for the high-speed backbone (master-to-drive communication) and CAN/CANopen for local sensor networks within individual machines or cells.

This approach leverages the strengths of both protocols: EtherCAT's speed for time-critical motion control, and CAN's simplicity and cost-effectiveness for distributed sensors and valve actuators.

For more on protocol selection within specific machine types, see our PLC Replacement by Protocol guide.

FAQ

EtherCAT and CANopen Questions

Is EtherCAT always better than CANopen for industrial control?
No. EtherCAT excels in high-speed motion control and large-node systems, but CANopen is more cost-effective for small distributed networks with moderate speed requirements. The right choice depends on your specific application requirements.
Can a single control board support both EtherCAT and CAN?
Yes. Our EtherCAT F429 board integrates both EtherCAT slave and CAN/CANopen interfaces, allowing it to serve as a bridge between high-speed Ethernet and legacy CAN networks in mixed architectures.
What is the cost difference between EtherCAT and CANopen implementation?
CAN hardware is generally cheaper (simple transceiver IC), while EtherCAT requires a dedicated slave controller chip (e.g., Beckhoff ET1100). However, EtherCAT reduces total system cost in large installations by using standard Ethernet cabling and switches.
← All Articles PLC Replacement Guide → STM32 Selection Guide → Request PLC Replacement Plan
Chat with us